Cases Citing Section 482
Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
undefined INSC 559 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5021 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5645 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== 1.Gajendra Thakur Son Of Late Devnath Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Pa...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 229 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →1978 1 SCC 248 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 602 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
offences punishable under Sections and 20 (I) (b) / (c) of the N.D.P.S. Act. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 3 Kg of ganja recovered in gumti. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that after recovery of the...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 488 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 418-12-2024In terms of the previous order dated 20.11.2024, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 2023 stands dismissed for non-compliance. manish/- (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 726 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of Sikandra P.S. Case no. 249 of 2022 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 34, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and one another are said to have struck Sintu Yadav with a tangi, seriously injuring h...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 387 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2017 10 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 477 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 428 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner has been made accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3761 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/3 in this case only because of the co...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →