Cases Citing Section 468
Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
undefined INSC 752 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 830 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
that he got secret information that the accused persons including the petitioner along with unknown accused were active members of Maoist movement are planning to commit extortion, recruitment of new Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13733 of 2024(4) dt.10-05-2024 2/2 recruits including carrying out d...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 327 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
SC/ST P.S. Case No. 19 of 2023 dated 10.07.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 323, 337, 354B, 509, 336, 504 and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 8 of the POCSO Act and sections 3(i)(r)(s) (w) / 3(2) (Va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 3. A...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 118 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.414 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.Sita Ram Singh, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village-Tarhari, Police Station-Halsi, District-Lakhisarai. 2.Priya Shankar Sah, son of Late Shree Kant...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 470 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
tried to forcibly evict the informant from the land in which his buffaloes were grazing and the informant was taking care of that land as caretaker on behalf of some other person. When the informant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6504 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/3 opposed his eviction, the p...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 251 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 103 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 393 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 858 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 869 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
dated 20.06.2023 in Anganbari Appeal Case No.6/22 by which Collector dismissed the Appeal without hearing the Appellant. (ii) For issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Patna High Court CWJC No.2438 of 2024(2) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 respondent Child Development Proj...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →