Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 468

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 752Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sharwan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 830Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

that he got secret information that the accused persons including the petitioner along with unknown accused were active members of Maoist movement are planning to commit extortion, recruitment of new Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13733 of 2024(4) dt.10-05-2024 2/2 recruits including carrying out d...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nunmani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 327Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

SC/ST P.S. Case No. 19 of 2023 dated 10.07.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 323, 337, 354B, 509, 336, 504 and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 8 of the POCSO Act and sections 3(i)(r)(s) (w) / 3(2) (Va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 3. A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 118Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.414 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.Sita Ram Singh, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village-Tarhari, Police Station-Halsi, District-Lakhisarai. 2.Priya Shankar Sah, son of Late Shree Kant...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 470Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

tried to forcibly evict the informant from the land in which his buffaloes were grazing and the informant was taking care of that land as caretaker on behalf of some other person. When the informant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6504 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/3 opposed his eviction, the p...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Babloo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 103Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 869Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

dated 20.06.2023 in Anganbari Appeal Case No.6/22 by which Collector dismissed the Appeal without hearing the Appellant. (ii) For issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Patna High Court CWJC No.2438 of 2024(2) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 respondent Child Development Proj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 8Next Page →