Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 418

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Chandradeo Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 612Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6909 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandradeo Mandal, Son of Dukhi Mandal, resident of Village- Khagor, P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai. ... ......

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 352Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sangita Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 413Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2020 ====================================================== Sangita Mandal Wife of Lakshman Mandal Resident of Nirsa Nagar, P.S. and District- Hatiya (Jharkhand) at present residing in the house of Gopal Kumar, 3LF/4/27...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 404Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.414 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.Sita Ram Singh, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village-Tarhari, Police Station-Halsi, District-Lakhisarai. 2.Priya Shankar Sah, son of Late Shree Kant...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

71% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

71% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 614Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

period starting from the Month of April, 2020 to 22.07.2021 and also from April 2004 to March 2005, as well as post retiral benefit, if any. On this prayer, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a Patna High Court CWJC No.414 of 2022(4) dt.10-09-2024 2/3 writ of mandamus against the respondent...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harsh Bhushan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 478Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4784 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2023 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Harsh Bhushan Thakur Son of Chandra Bhushan Thakur R/o vill - Tarkanala Main Road Buxar, P.S....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 185Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

passenger from the running train upon his opposition for not to do the illegal act. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9330 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2 also submits that there is no mate...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 456Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.426 of 2022 ====================================================== Jyoti Kumari W/o Ajeet Kumar Aryan R/v- Paharpur, Ward No- 9, Gram Panchayat Alampur Kodaria, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →