Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 416

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 838Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Avinash Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6 Mr. Wasi Mohammad, AC to SC-6 For the Corporation : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 677Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

passenger from the running train upon his opposition for not to do the illegal act. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9330 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2 also submits that there is no mate...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 9/10 decision that in the absence of an agree...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sangita Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 264Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

: Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 423-10-2024 Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no interest in prosecuting...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 805Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

period starting from the Month of April, 2020 to 22.07.2021 and also from April 2004 to March 2005, as well as post retiral benefit, if any. On this prayer, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a Patna High Court CWJC No.414 of 2022(4) dt.10-09-2024 2/3 writ of mandamus against the respondent...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 379Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 342Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

labourer. He does not get work on each and every day in a month. Therefore, it is not financially possible for him to pay Rs. 6,000/- (Six thousand) per month to the opposite party. Accordingly, the learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the amount of maintenance allowance may be reduced ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →