Cases Citing Section 416
Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
2014 8 SCC 273 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2013 2 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 396 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are in custody in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 478, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4141 of 2024(5) dt.08-10-2024 2/3 3. As per allegation in the FIR, pet...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →1973 4 SCC 225 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 847 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 562 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4141 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-765 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Kumar Pushpak S/O Late Parmeshwer Prasad R/O Villag- Ruidhasa, Kali Mandir, P.S And Di...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 109 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.414 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.Sita Ram Singh, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village-Tarhari, Police Station-Halsi, District-Lakhisarai. 2.Priya Shankar Sah, son of Late Shree Kant...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2017 10 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 459 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6909 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandradeo Mandal, Son of Dukhi Mandal, resident of Village- Khagor, P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai. ... ......
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 439 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.426 of 2022 ====================================================== Jyoti Kumari W/o Ajeet Kumar Aryan R/v- Paharpur, Ward No- 9, Gram Panchayat Alampur Kodaria, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →