Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 3

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Harsh Bhushan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 255Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 4, 8, 6 of the POCSO Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2023 and has no criminal antecedent. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner namely, Harsh Bhushan Thakur (i...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

but a ‘superstructure’ erected/installed on the platform of 30 ft height and the statue encompasses the word ‘superstructure’ mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. The learned counsel next Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 5/10 submitted that, as per Clause 5(ii) of the Ag...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 780Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

71% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 273Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

as also the petitioners having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 776Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 3/3 circumstances of the case as well as...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 876Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief J...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shakti Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 255Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of charge and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 283 of 2023 subject to the following conditions as well as the co...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →