Cases Citing Section 3
Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
undefined INSC 255 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 4, 8, 6 of the POCSO Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2023 and has no criminal antecedent. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner namely, Harsh Bhushan Thakur (i...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 562 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 638 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
but a ‘superstructure’ erected/installed on the platform of 30 ft height and the statue encompasses the word ‘superstructure’ mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. The learned counsel next Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 5/10 submitted that, as per Clause 5(ii) of the Ag...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 161 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 780 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 273 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
as also the petitioners having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 776 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 3/3 circumstances of the case as well as...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2017 10 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 876 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief J...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 255 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of charge and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 283 of 2023 subject to the following conditions as well as the co...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →