Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 264

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

work shops or of such other work of the State Government or, as the case may be, of the public undertaking, as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify and includes- Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 7/10 (i) a contract made for the supply of g...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Parmanand Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 373Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

for the offence registered under sections 342, 323, 147, 149, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 13.07.2023 by the informant Jampa Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 09.07.2023, when the informant’s husband was going to meet Md. Rafik, the accused persons ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 103Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 842Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

passenger from the running train upon his opposition for not to do the illegal act. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9330 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2 also submits that there is no mate...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 560Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6732 of 2017 ====================================================== Yogendra Prasad son of late Rameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village Makhdumpur, Police Station- Ekangarsara...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 828Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4141 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-765 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Kumar Pushpak S/O Late Parmeshwer Prasad R/O Villag- Ruidhasa, Kali Mandir, P.S And Di...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 653Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4171 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2023 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Kapil Paswan S/O Late Rameshar Paswan R/O Village- Habipur, P.S- Gurua, Distt.-GAYA. ... ... ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 855Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 710Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 371Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of Sikandra P.S. Case no. 249 of 2022 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 34, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and one another are said to have struck Sintu Yadav with a tangi, seriously injuring h...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →