Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 264

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Mithlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 414Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

No. 163 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 394/395/412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against four unknown miscreants is that they assaulted the informant and looted a cas...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Parmanand Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 302Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

alleged that on 09.07.2023, when the informant’s husband was going to meet Md. Rafik, the accused persons surrounded and assaulted with fists and slap and also took away Rs. 50,000/- from his pocket. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3756 of 2024(3) dt.09-04-2024 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 195Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 3/3 circumstances of the case as well as...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 898Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 516Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 895Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that over a Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3899 of 2024(3) dt.21-03-2024 2/3 petty dispute, they began to abuse a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Parmanand Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 463Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

for the offence registered under sections 342, 323, 147, 149, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 13.07.2023 by the informant Jampa Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 09.07.2023, when the informant’s husband was going to meet Md. Rafik, the accused persons ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 409Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 200Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

passenger from the running train upon his opposition for not to do the illegal act. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9330 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2 also submits that there is no mate...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →