Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 24

Statute: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996)

Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 299Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s: Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 231-07-2024At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that he seeks permission ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 832Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

petitioner submitted clay model of statue of Lord Budha in Bhumi Sparsh posture which was approved by the respondents, amongst other bidders. The petitioner also became successful in a financial bid and thereafter work order was issued to him, vide letter no. 487 dated 14.08.2013, issued by...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 627Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 554Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 307Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 485Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

that in the present case, prima facie, petitioner as well as 1 st auction purchaser have made out a case that they are tentatively entitled to a sum of Rs.14 lakhs plus interest on behalf of the petitioner and first auction purchaser @ Rs. 7,89,700/-. If these amounts are required to be determined ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 874Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2681 of 2019 ====================================================== Kaushal Kumar S/o Late Jagdish Kumar Vidyarthi R/o Village- Muhabbatpur, PO- Muhabbatpurvia Dewaiya Kothi, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Baby Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 140Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

deceased Dinesh Singh is not ready to give affidavit and as such till date the pension or other retiral benefits has not been distributed proportionately. 7. At this juncture, learned Advocate for the respondents submitted that since there is a dispute with regard to the claim and as such they have...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →